This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 21 No. 1 (Winter 2007)
JEP Volume. 21, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Article Citation
Coates, John C. IV. 2007. "The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
21(1): 91-116.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.21.1.91
DOI: 10.1257/jep.21.1.91
Abstract
The primary goal of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was to fix auditing of U.S. public companies,
consistent with its full, official name: the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002. By consensus, auditing had been working poorly, and increasingly so. The most important, and most promising, part of Sarbanes-Oxley was the creation of a unique, quasi-public institution to oversee and regulate
auditing, the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (PCAOB). In controversial
section 404, the law also created new
disclosure-based incentives for firms to spend
money on internal controls, above increases that would have occurred after the corporate scandals of the early 2000s. In exchange for these higher costs, which have already fallen
substantially, Sarbanes-Oxley promises a variety of long-term benefits. Investors will face a lower risk of losses from fraud and theft, and benefit from more reliable financial reporting, greater transparency, and
accountability. Public companies will pay a
lower cost of capital, and the economy will
benefit because of a better allocation of
resources and faster growth. Sarbanes-Oxley
remains a work in progress -- section 404 in
particular was implemented too aggressively -
but reformers should push for continued
improvements in its implementation, by PCAOB, rather than for repeal of the legislation itself.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Coates, John C. IV
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

