This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 15 No. 2 (Spring 2001)
JEP Volume. 15, Issue 2 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
Exclusivity and Tying in U.S. v. Microsoft: What We Know, and Don't Know
Article Citation
Whinston, Michael D. 2001. "Exclusivity and Tying in U.S. v. Microsoft: What We Know, and Don't Know."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
15(2): 63-80.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.2.63
DOI: 10.1257/jep.15.2.63
Abstract
Research on capital structure attempts to explain how corporations finance real investment, with particular emphasis on the proportions of debt vs. equity financing. There is no universal theory of the debt-equity choice, and no reason to expect one. But three useful conditional theories are reviewed in this paper. The tradeoff theory says that firms seek debt levels that balance the tax advantages of additional debt against the costs of possible financial distress. The pecking order theory says that the firm will borrow, rather than issuing equity, when internal cash flow is not sufficient to fund capital expenditures. Thus, the amount of debt will reflect the firm's cumulative need for external funds. The free cash flow theory says that dangerously high debt levels will increase value, despite the threat of financial distress. Each of these theories "works" for some firms in some circumstances. More general theories will require a deeper understanding of the financial objectives of corporate managers.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Whinston, Michael D. (Northwestern U and NBER)
JEL Classifications
L86: Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
K21: Antitrust Law
K41: Litigation Process
L41: Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
L51: Economics of Regulation
K21: Antitrust Law
K41: Litigation Process
L41: Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
L51: Economics of Regulation
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

