This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 12 No. 2 (Spring 1998)
JEP Volume. 12, Issue 2 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions
Article Citation
Stiglitz, Joseph. 1998. "Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
12(2): 3-22.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.12.2.3
DOI: 10.1257/jep.12.2.3
Abstract
[Joseph Stiglitz was a member of the Council of Economic Advisers from 1993-95, and chairman of the CEA from 1995 through February 1997.] Today, I want to share with you some of my thoughts about the possibilities and limitations of government. These thoughts are focused around a simple question: Why is it so difficult to implement even Pareto improvements? Working in Washington, I quickly saw that although a few potential changes were strictly Pareto improvements, there were many other changes that would hurt only a small, narrowly defined group (for example, increasing the efficiency of the legal system might hurt lawyers). But if everyone except a narrowly defined special interest group could be shown to benefit, surely the change should be made. In practice, however, "almost everyone" was rarely sufficient in government policy-making and often such near-Pareto improvements did not occur. My major theme will be to provide a set of explanations for why this might be so. I shall put forward four hypotheses in this lecture, each of which provides part of the explanation for the failure in at least one instance of a proposed Pareto improvement. These hypotheses, like much of the literature on government failures, focus on the role of incentives: how misaligned incentives can induce government officials to take actions that are not, in any sense, in the public interest.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Stiglitz, Joseph (World Bank)
JEL Classifications
A11: Role of Economics; Role of Economists
H11: Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
D73: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
H11: Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
D73: Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

