This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. 46 No. 1 (March 2008)
JEL Volume. 46, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
Explore:
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles
Article Citation
Clark, Andrew E.,
Paul Frijters, and
Michael A. Shields. 2008. "Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles."
Journal of Economic Literature,
46(1): 95-144.
DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.1.95
DOI: 10.1257/jel.46.1.95
Abstract
The well-known Easterlin paradox points out that average happiness has remained
constant over time despite sharp rises in GNP per head. At the same time, a micro
literature has typically found positive correlations between individual income and
individual measures of subjective well-being. This paper suggests that these two findings
are consistent with the presence of relative income terms in the utility function.
Income may be evaluated relative to others (social comparison) or to oneself in the
past (habituation). We review the evidence on relative income from the subjective
well-being literature. We also discuss the relation (or not) between happiness and
utility, and discuss some nonhappiness research (behavioral, experimental, neurological)
related to income comparisons. We last consider how relative income in
the utility function can affect economic models of behavior in the domains of consumption,
investment, economic growth, savings, taxation, labor supply, wages, and
migration.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Clark, Andrew E. (Paris School of Economics and IZA)
Frijters, Paul (Queensland U Technology)
Shields, Michael A. (U Melbourne)
Frijters, Paul (Queensland U Technology)
Shields, Michael A. (U Melbourne)
JEL Classifications
I31: General Welfare

