This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

American Economic Review: Vol. 91 No. 3 (June 2001)
AER Volume. 91, Issue 3 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
AER Forthcoming Articles
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
AER Forthcoming Articles
Rules, Communication, and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case
Article Citation
Genesove, David, and
Wallace P. Mullin. 2001. "Rules, Communication, and Collusion: Narrative Evidence from the Sugar Institute Case."
American Economic Review,
91(3): 379-398.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.3.379
DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.3.379
Abstract
Detailed notes on weekly meetings of the sugar-refining cartel show how communication helps firms collude, and so highlight the deficiencies in the current formal theory of collusion. The Sugar Institute did not fix prices or output. Prices were increased by homogenizing business practices to make price cutting more transparent. Meetings were used to interpret and adapt the agreement, coordinate on jointly profitable actions, ensure unilateral actions were not misconstrued as cheating, and determine whether cheating had occurred. In contrast to established theories, cheating did occur, but sparked only limited retaliation, partly due to the contractual relations with selling agents.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Genesove, David (Hebrew U Jerusalem)
Mullin, Wallace P. (MI State U)
Mullin, Wallace P. (MI State U)
JEL Classifications
L13: Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
L12: Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
L41: Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
N72: Economic History: Transport, Trade, Energy, Technology, and Other Services: U.S.; Canada: 1913-
L12: Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
L41: Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
N72: Economic History: Transport, Trade, Energy, Technology, and Other Services: U.S.; Canada: 1913-

