This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

American Economic Review: Vol. 90 No. 5 (December 2000)
AER Volume. 90, Issue 5 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
AER Forthcoming Articles
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
AER Forthcoming Articles
Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?
Article Citation
Hoxby, Caroline M. 2000. "Does Competition among Public Schools Benefit Students and Taxpayers?."
American Economic Review,
90(5): 1209-1238.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.5.1209
DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.5.1209
Abstract
Tiebout choice among districts is the most powerful market force in American public education. Naive estimates of its effects are biased by endogenous district formation. I derive instruments from the natural boundaries in a metropolitan area. My results suggest that metropolitan areas with greater Tiebout choice have more productive public schools and less private schooling. Little of the effect of Tiebout choice works through its effect on household sorting. This finding may be explained by another finding: students are equally segregated by school in metropolitan areas with greater and lesser degrees of Tiebout choice among districts.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Hoxby, Caroline M. (Harvard U)
JEL Classifications
I21: Analysis of Education
H73: State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations: Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
L33: Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises; Privatization; Contracting Out
H73: State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations: Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
L33: Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises; Privatization; Contracting Out

