This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

American Economic Review: Vol. 102 No. 3 (May 2012)
AER Volume. 102, Issue 3 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
AER Forthcoming Articles
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
AER Forthcoming Articles
Race and Gender Differences under Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Article Citation
Sorensen, Todd,
Supriya Sarnikar, and
Ronald L. Oaxaca. 2012. "Race and Gender Differences under Federal Sentencing Guidelines."
American Economic Review,
102(3): 256-60.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.3.256
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.3.256
Abstract
Using data from the United States Sentencing Commission, we examine how judicial biases may have influenced sentences during the era of the Federal criminal sentencing guidelines. Our utility maximization model of judicial sentencing preferences leads to a partially censored ordered probit model that accounts for mass points in the sentencing distribution that occur at the upper and lower guideline limits and at sentences involving no prison time. Our results indicate that racial- and gender-based discrepancies exist, even after controlling for circumstances such as the severity of the offense and past criminal history.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Sorensen, Todd (U CA, Riverside)
Sarnikar, Supriya (Westfield State U)
Oaxaca, Ronald L. (U AZ)
Sarnikar, Supriya (Westfield State U)
Oaxaca, Ronald L. (U AZ)
JEL Classifications
J15: Economics of Minorities, Races, and Immigrants; Non-labor Discrimination
J16: Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
J16: Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
K42: Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

