This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 9 No. 2 (Spring 1995)
JEP Volume. 9, Issue 2 | 
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research
Article Citation
Burtless, Gary. 1995. "The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
9(2): 63-84.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.2.63
DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.2.63
Abstract
Social experiments have been used in research since the 1960s, yet the technique of controlled experimentation still arouses controversy among social scientists. The crucial element that distinguishes a controlled experiment from other forms of research is random assignment of treatment to the observational units of study. Because treatment differences in the sample occur as a result of random chance, the effects of the treatment on behavior can be measured with high reliability. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques and describes the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Burtless, Gary (Brookings Institution)
JEL Classifications
C93: Field Experiments
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
