This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 7 No. 4 (Fall 1993)
JEP Volume. 7, Issue 4 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems Can Work
Article Citation
Ostrom, Elinor, and
Roy Gardner. 1993. "Coping with Asymmetries in the Commons: Self-Governing Irrigation Systems Can Work."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
7(4): 93-112.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.7.4.93
DOI: 10.1257/jep.7.4.93
Abstract
Many analysts presume that the appropriators of a common-pool resource are trapped in a Hobbesian state of nature and cannot themselves create rules to counteract the perverse incentives they face in managing the resource. The logical consequence of this view is to recommend that an external authority—"the" government—take over the commons. But considerable empirical evidence from field and experimental settings holds that appropriators frequently do constitute and enforce their own rules, and that these rules work. Our research agenda is to develop a coherent understanding of the set of conditions that enhance or detract from self-organizing capabilities when individuals differ substantially from one another. For the sake of concreteness, this paper focuses on the asymmetry present in most irrigation systems between those who are physically near the source of water (the head-enders) and those who are physically distant from it (the tail-enders). This paper first explores the interaction between head-end and tail-end farmers, particularly their decisions about whether to devote resources to the upkeep of the irrigation system, and how bargaining between the parties can benefit all sides. Finally, we examine empirical evidence from a study of irrigation institutions in Nepal and discuss the broader practical significance of our findings.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Ostrom, Elinor (IN U)
Gardner, Roy (IN U)
Gardner, Roy (IN U)
JEL Classifications
Q15: Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation
Q21: Renewable Resources and Conservation: Demand and Supply (the Commons
Q21: Renewable Resources and Conservation: Demand and Supply (the Commons
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

