This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 6 No. 3 (Summer 1992)
JEP Volume. 6, Issue 3 | 
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
Retrospectives: The Lost Art of Economics
Article Citation
Colander, David. 1992. "Retrospectives: The Lost Art of Economics."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
6(3): 191-198.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.6.3.191
DOI: 10.1257/jep.6.3.191
Abstract
Economists generally divide economics into two distinct categories—positive and normative—but how applied economics fits within these categories is unclear. This paper argues that applied economics belongs in neither normative nor positive economics; instead it belongs in a third category—the art of economics. Currently, many economists are trying to use a methodology appropriate for positive economics to guide their applied work, work that properly belongs in the art of economics. This three-part distinction is not mine, but dates back to a classic book, The
Scope and Method of Political Economy (1891) by John Neville Keynes. In his book, Keynes argued that economists' failure to distinguish the art of economics as a separate branch from positive and normative economics would lead to serious problems. One hundred years later, he has turned out to be clairvoyant.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Colander, David (Middlebury College)
JEL Classifications
B41: Economic Methodology
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
