This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 27 No. 1 (Winter 2013)
JEP Volume. 27, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
Carbon Markets 15 Years after Kyoto: Lessons Learned, New Challenges
Article Citation
Newell, Richard G.,
William A. Pizer, and
Daniel Raimi. 2013. "Carbon Markets 15 Years after Kyoto: Lessons Learned, New Challenges."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
27(1): 123-46.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.27.1.123
DOI: 10.1257/jep.27.1.123
Abstract
Carbon markets are substantial and they are expanding. There are many lessons from market experiences over the past eight years: there should be fewer free allowances, better management of market-sensitive information, and a recognition that trading systems require adjustments that have consequences for market participants and market confidence. Moreover, the emerging
market architecture features separate emissions trading systems serving distinct jurisdictions and a variety of other types of policies exist alongside the carbon markets.This situation is in sharp
contrast to the top-down, integrated global trading architecture envisioned 15 years ago by the designers of the Kyoto Protocol and raises a suite of new questions. In this new architecture, jurisdictions with emissions trading have to decide how, whether, and when to link with one another. Stakeholders and policymakers must confront how to measure the comparability of efforts among markets as well as relative to a variety of other policy approaches. International
negotiators must in turn work out a global agreement that can accommodate and support increasingly bottom-up approaches to carbon markets and climate change mitigation.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Newell, Richard G. (Duke U and Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
Pizer, William A. (Duke U and Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
Raimi, Daniel (Duke U)
Pizer, William A. (Duke U and Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
Raimi, Daniel (Duke U)
JEL Classifications
Q54: Climate; Natural Disasters; Global Warming
Q58: Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Q58: Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

