This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 26 No. 4 (Fall 2012)
JEP Volume. 26, Issue 4 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
How Did China Take Off?
Article Citation
Huang, Yasheng. 2012. "How Did China Take Off?."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
26(4): 147-70.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.26.4.147
DOI: 10.1257/jep.26.4.147
Abstract
There are two prevailing perspectives on how China took off. One emphasizes the role of globalization—foreign trade and investments and special economic zones; the other emphasizes
the role of internal reforms, especially rural reforms. Detailed documentary and quantitative evidence provides strong support for the second hypothesis. To understand how China's economy took off requires an accurate and detailed understanding of its rural development, especially rural industry spearheaded by the rise of township and village enterprises. Many China scholars believe that township and village enterprises have a distinct ownership structure—that they are owned and operated by local governments rather than by private entrepreneurs. I will show that township and village enterprises from the inception have been private and that China undertook significant and meaningful financial liberalization at the very start of reforms. Rural private entrepreneurship and financial reforms correlate strongly with some of China's best-known achievements—poverty reduction, fast GDP growth driven by personal consumption (rather than by corporate investments and government spending), and an initial decline of income inequality. The conventional view of China scholars is right about one point—that today's Chinese financial sector is completely
state-controlled. This is because China reversed almost all of its financial liberalization sometime around the early to mid 1990s. This financial reversal, despite its monumental effect on the welfare of hundreds of millions of rural Chinese, is almost completely unknown in the West.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Huang, Yasheng (MIT)
JEL Classifications
E23: Macroeconomics: Production
F13: Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F43: Economic Growth of Open Economies
O11: Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O18: Economic Development: Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
P24: Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies: National Income, Product, and Expenditure; Money; Inflation
P25: Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies: Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
F13: Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
F43: Economic Growth of Open Economies
O11: Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
O18: Economic Development: Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
P24: Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies: National Income, Product, and Expenditure; Money; Inflation
P25: Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies: Urban, Rural, and Regional Economics
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

