Comment on the Modigliani-Miller Propositions

Ross, Stephen A.

doi:10.1257/jep.2.4.127

This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.

Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 2 No. 4 (Fall 1988)

JEP Volume. 2, Issue 4 | left

Previous Article Next Article right

Expand

Quick Tools:

Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export Citation
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter

Explore:

JEP - All Issues

Comment on the Modigliani-Miller Propositions

Article Citation

Ross, Stephen A. 1988. "Comment on the Modigliani-Miller Propositions." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(4): 127-133.

DOI: 10.1257/jep.2.4.127

Abstract

[This is a comment on "The Modigliani-Miller Propositions after Thirty Years" by Merton H. Miller in this same issue.] What a treat it is to have the opportunity to read Merton Miller's ruminations on the MM Propositions. A comment on Miller and Modigliani's work can easily become a discussion of any facet of modern finance. I will focus on the two areas of arbitrage and taxation. Since the original MM analysis, economists have learned an enormous amount about the role played by no arbitrage conditions in financial markets. Taxation is where the real world meets the theory. At first blush, the corporate deduction for interest seemed to doom the MM analysis to an academic curiosity, since it appeared to give debt an obvious cost advantage over equity. It was the genius of Miller to see that the arbitrage analysis went much too deeply into the workings of the financial markets and the economy as a whole to be easily unseated by even something as powerful as the tax code.

Article Full-Text Access

Full-text Article (Complimentary)

Authors

Ross, Stephen A. (Unlisted)

JEL Classifications

521: Business Finance

Comments

View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment