Comment on Poirier: Dogma or Doubt?

Pagan, Adrian

doi:10.1257/jep.2.1.153

This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.

Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 2 No. 1 (Winter 1988)

JEP Volume. 2, Issue 1 | left

Previous Article Next Article right

Expand

Quick Tools:

Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export Citation
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter

Explore:

JEP - All Issues

Comment on Poirier: Dogma or Doubt?

Article Citation

Pagan, Adrian. 1988. "Comment on Poirier: Dogma or Doubt?." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1): 153-158.

DOI: 10.1257/jep.2.1.153

Abstract

[This paper responds to "Frequentist and Subjectivist Perspectives on the Problems of Model Building in Economics," by Dale J. Poirier, in this same issue.] Poirier appeals to the latent statistician that he hopes is lurking behind every economist. Like a good fundamentalist preacher he demands, "Do you believe in the Likelihood Principle?" As with most doctrines, we give it a quick glance and reply, "Amen, brother." From there on we are trapped and led inexorably, via the creed of the likelihood principle (LP), to the one true religion of Bayesianism. Before I begin my critique, let me compliment the preacher on his sermon. I doubt if one could find a more engaging, beguiling, or coherent account of the strengths of following the Bayesian methodology. Next I provide a personal testimony concerning what bothers me about the dogmas of the recommended religion.

Article Full-Text Access

Full-text Article (Complimentary)

Authors

Pagan, Adrian (Unlisted)

JEL Classifications

212: Construction, Analysis, and Use of Econometric Models
211: Bayesian Statistics and Bayesian Econometrics

Comments

View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment