This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. 48 No. 1 (March 2010)
JEL Volume. 48, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
Explore:
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)Civil War
Article Citation
Blattman, Christopher, and
Edward Miguel. 2010. "Civil War."
Journal of Economic Literature,
48(1): 3-57.
DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.1.3
DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.1.3
Abstract
Most nations have experienced an internal armed conflict since 1960. Yet while
civil war is central to many nations' development, it has stood at the periphery of
economics research and teaching. The past decade has witnessed a long overdue
explosion of research into war's causes and consequences. We summarize progress,
identify weaknesses, and chart a path forward. Why war? Existing theory is provocative
but incomplete, omitting advances in behavioral economics and making
little progress in key areas, like why armed groups form and cohere, or how more
than two armed sides compete. Empirical work finds that low per capita incomes
and slow economic growth are both robustly linked to civil war. Yet there is little
consensus on the most effective policies to avert conflicts or promote postwar
recovery. Cross-country analysis of war will benefit from more attention to causal
identification and stronger links to theory. We argue that micro-level analysis and
case studies are also crucial to decipher war's causes, conduct, and consequences.
We bring a growth theoretic approach to the study of conflict consequences to highlight
areas for research, most of all the study of war's impact on institutions. We
conclude with a plea for new and better data. ( JEL D72, D74, O17)
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Blattman, Christopher (Yale U)
Miguel, Edward (U CA, Berkeley)
Miguel, Edward (U CA, Berkeley)
JEL Classifications
D72: Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D74: Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
O17: Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
D74: Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
O17: Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements

