This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. 45 No. 4 (December 2007)
JEL Volume. 45, Issue 4 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
Explore:
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)A True Development Round? A Review of Joseph E. Stiglitz and Andrew Charlton's Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development
Article Citation
Lawrence, Robert Z. 2007. "A True Development Round? A Review of Joseph E. Stiglitz and Andrew Charlton's Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development."
Journal of Economic Literature,
45(4): 1001-1010.
DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.4.1001
DOI: 10.1257/jel.45.4.1001
Abstract
In Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development, Stiglitz and Charlton
prescribe what a multilateral trade agreement--that promotes development and is fair
for all--would include. This review appraises their prescriptions and offers some
alternatives. Many of their ideas about what developed countries should do (opening
markets, especially of labor intensive goods and services and cutting farm subsidies)
are quite familiar and sensible. More controversially, however, they propose that all
WTO members (both developed and developing) completely open their markets to all
developing countries poorer and smaller than themselves. They also stress the importance
of preserving domestic policy space, dropping intellectual property rules from
the WTO and keeping restrictive rules off the agenda. Among its criticisms of the book,
the review points out that the liberalization proposal contradicts their own arguments
favoring individually tailored policies in developing countries and is likely to maximize
trade diversion. In addition, their prescriptions for more policy space neglects
the more desirable possibility of a WTO in which members accept differentiated
commitments.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Lawrence, Robert Z.
JEL Classifications
F13: Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
K33: International Law
K33: International Law

