American Economics Association
AEA Logo


American Economic Review


Search:






AEA Member Login:


Quick Tools:

View Full Text of This Article

Download Data Set

Appendix

Email Link to this Article

Export Citation

Sign up for Email Alerts

Explore:

AER - Previous Issues

AER - December 2009

JEL Indexes (Members Only)

American Economic Review

Vol. 99, No. 5, December 2009


On the Possibility of Credit Rationing in the Stiglitz-Weiss Model
Lutz G. Arnold and John G. Riley

Article Citation
Arnold, Lutz G., and John G. Riley. 2009. "On the Possibility of Credit Rationing in the Stiglitz-Weiss Model." American Economic Review, 99(5): 2012–21.
DOI:10.1257/aer.99.5.2012

Abstract
Contrary to what is usually assumed, the expected revenue for lenders as a function of the loan rate cannot be globally hump-shaped in the Stiglitz-Weiss (1981) adverse selection model with a continuum of types. This has important implications. First, if there is credit rationing, there must be at least two equilibrium loan rates. Second, while at the low rate loans are rationed, all those applicants willing to pay the high rate are then served. Numerical analysis shows that unless the joint distribution of risk class and output is rather special, the two loan rate outcome with rationing is unlikely. (JEL D82, G21)

Article Full-Text Access
Full-Text Article

Additional Materials
Download Data Set | Appendix



Authors
Arnold, Lutz G. (U Regensburg)
Riley, John G. (UCLA)

JEL Classifications
D82: Asymmetric and Private Information
G21: Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages