This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

American Economic Review: Vol. 99 No. 5 (December 2009)
AER Volume. 99, Issue 5 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
AER Forthcoming Articles
Full-text Article
Download Data Set (11.17 KB) | Appendix (73.38 KB)
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
AER Forthcoming Articles
Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match
Article Citation
Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila,
Parag A. Pathak, and
Alvin E. Roth. 2009. "Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match."
American Economic Review,
99(5): 1954-78.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.5.1954
DOI: 10.1257/aer.99.5.1954
Abstract
The design of the New York City (NYC) high school match involved trade-offs
among efficiency, stability, and strategy-proofness that raise new theoretical
questions. We analyze a model with indifferences -- ties -- in school preferences.
Simulations with field data and the theory favor breaking indifferences
the same way at every school -- single tiebreaking -- in a student-proposing
deferred acceptance mechanism. Any inefficiency associated with a realized
tiebreaking cannot be removed without harming student incentives. Finally,
we empirically document the extent of potential efficiency loss associated with
strategy-proofness and stability, and direct attention to some open questions.
(JEL C78, D82, I21)
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Additional Materials
Download Data Set (11.17 KB) | Appendix (73.38 KB)
Authors
Abdulkadiroğlu, Atila (Duke U)
Pathak, Parag A. (MIT)
Roth, Alvin E. (Harvard U)
Pathak, Parag A. (MIT)
Roth, Alvin E. (Harvard U)
JEL Classifications
C78: Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
D82: Asymmetric and Private Information
I21: Analysis of Education
D82: Asymmetric and Private Information
I21: Analysis of Education

