American Economics Association
AEA Logo


American Economic Review


Search:






AEA Member Login:


Quick Tools:

View Full Text of This Article

Download Data Set

Online Appendix

Email Link to this Article

Export Citation

Sign up for Email Alerts

Explore:

AER - Previous Issues

AER - September 2009

JEL Indexes (Members Only)

American Economic Review

Vol. 99, No. 4, September 2009


Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence
Raj Chetty, Adam Looney and Kory Kroft

Article Citation
Chetty, Raj, Adam Looney, and Kory Kroft. 2009. "Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence." American Economic Review, 99(4): 1145–77.
DOI:10.1257/aer.99.4.1145

Abstract
Using two strategies, we show that consumers underreact to taxes that are not salient. First, using a field experiment in a grocery store, we find that posting tax-inclusive price tags reduces demand by 8 percent. Second, increases in taxes included in posted prices reduce alcohol consumption more than increases in taxes applied at the register. We develop a theoretical framework for applied welfare analysis that accommodates salience effects and other optimization failures. The simple formulas we derive imply that the economic incidence of a tax depends on its statutory incidence, and that even policies that induce no change in behavior can create efficiency losses. (JEL C93, D12, H25, H71)

Article Full-Text Access
Full-Text Article

Additional Materials
Download Data Set | Online Appendix



Authors
Chetty, Raj (U CA, Berkeley)
Looney, Adam (Federal Reserve Board)
Kroft, Kory (U CA, Berkeley)

JEL Classifications
C93: Field Experiments
D12: Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
H25: Business Taxes and Subsidies including sales and value-added (VAT)
H71: State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue