American Economics Association
AEA Logo


American Economic Review


Search:






AEA Member Login:


Quick Tools:

View Full Text of This Article

Download Data Set

Email Link to this Article

Export Citation

Sign up for Email Alerts

Explore:

AER - Previous Issues

AER - June 2008

JEL Indexes (Members Only)

American Economic Review

Vol. 98, No. 3, June 2008


Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2x2-Games
Reinhard Selten and Thorsten Chmura

Article Citation
Selten, Reinhard, and Thorsten Chmura. 2008. "Stationary Concepts for Experimental 2x2-Games." American Economic Review, 98(3): 938–66.
DOI:10.1257/aer.98.3.938

Abstract
Five stationary concepts for completely mixed 2 x 2-games are experimentally compared: Nash equilibrium, quantal response equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium (Martin J. Osborne and Ariel Rubinstein 1998), and impulse balance equilibrium. Experiments on 12 games, 6 constant sum games, and 6 nonconstant sum games were run with 12 independent subject groups for each constant sum game and 6 independent subject groups for each nonconstant sum game. Each independent subject group consisted of four players 1 and four players 2, interacting anonymously over 200 periods with random matching. The comparison of the five theories shows that the order of performance from best to worst is as follows: impulse balance equilibrium, payoff-sampling equilibrium, action-sampling equilibrium, quantal response equilibrium, Nash equilibrium.

Article Full-Text Access
Full-Text Article

Additional Materials
Download Data Set



Authors
Selten, Reinhard (Laboratory of Experimental Economics, Bonn)
Chmura, Thorsten (Shanghai Jiao Tong U)

JEL Classifications
C70: Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General