American Economics Association
AEA Logo


American Economic Review


Search:






AEA Member Login:


Quick Tools:

View Full Text of This Article

Link to Appendix

Email Link to this Article

Export Citation

Sign up for Email Alerts

Explore:

AER - Previous Issues

AER - June 2008

JEL Indexes (Members Only)

American Economic Review

Vol. 98, No. 3, June 2008


Matching with Contracts: Comment
John William Hatfield and Fuhito Kojima

Article Citation
Hatfield, John William, and Fuhito Kojima. 2008. "Matching with Contracts: Comment." American Economic Review, 98(3): 1189–94.
DOI:10.1257/aer.98.3.1189

Abstract
Hatfield and Milgrom (2005) present a unified model of matching with contracts phrased in terms of hospitals and doctors, which subsumes the standard two-sided matching and some package auction models. They show that a stable allocation exists if contracts are substitutes for each hospital. They further claim that if a hospital's preferences violate the substitutes condition, there exist singleton preferences for the other hospitals and doctors such that no stable allocation exists. We show this last claim does not hold in general. We further present a weaker condition that is necessary to guarantee the existence of stable allocations.

Article Full-Text Access
Full-Text Article

Additional Materials
Link to Appendix



Authors
Hatfield, John William (Stanford U)
Kojima, Fuhito (Harvard U)

JEL Classifications
C78: Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
D86: Economics of Contract: Theory
J41: Labor Contracts