This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

American Economic Review: Vol. 102 No. 1 (February 2012)
AER Volume. 102, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
AER Forthcoming Articles
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
AER Forthcoming Articles
Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right: Comment
Article Citation
Fraas, Art, and
Randall Lutter. 2012. "Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right: Comment."
American Economic Review,
102(1): 602-07.
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.1.602
DOI: 10.1257/aer.102.1.602
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of cap-and-trade emissions regulations has become widely
accepted. A 2009 proposal by Muller and Mendelsohn would replace conventional ton-for-ton trading with trading based on estimates of marginal damages by pollutant and by source. This proposal faces difficulties arising from the negative marginal damage estimates—neglected in Muller and Mendelsohn (2009)—for nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from many urban counties. Such estimates imply nonconvexities in air chemistry that complicate trading and could result in trades that increase emissions by both buyer and seller. Uncertainty in source-specific damages also creates rent-seeking opportunities and the potential for costly litigation. (JEL H53, Q53, Q58)
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Fraas, Art (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
Lutter, Randall (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
Lutter, Randall (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC)
JEL Classifications
H53: National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs
Q53: Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
Q58: Environmental Economics: Government Policy
Q53: Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
Q58: Environmental Economics: Government Policy

