This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Literature: Vol. 42 No. 1 (March 2004)
JEL Volume. 42, Issue 1 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)
Full-text Article
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter Subscription Information
(Institutional Administrator Access)
Explore:
JEL Forthcoming Articles
JEL Indexes (Members Only)Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far
Article Citation
Winters, L. Alan,
Neil McCulloch, and
Andrew McKay. 2004. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty: The Evidence So Far ."
The Journal of Economic Literature,
42(1): 72-115.
DOI: 10.1257/002205104773558056
DOI: 10.1257/002205104773558056
Abstract
This paper assesses the current state of evidence on the impact of trade policy reform on poverty in developing countries. There is little empirical evidence addressing this question directly, but a lot of related evidence on specific aspects. We summarize this evidence using an analytic framework addressing four key areas: economic growth and stability; households and markets; wages and employment and government revenue. Twelve key questions are identified and empirical studies and results are discussed. We argue that there is no simple generalizable conclusion about the relationship between trade liberalization and poverty, and the picture is much less negative than is often suggested. In the long run and on average, trade liberalization is likely to be strongly poverty alleviating, and there is no convincing evidence that it will generally increase overall poverty or vulnerability. But there is evidence that the poor may be less well placed in the short run to protect themselves against adverse effects and take advantage of favorable opportunities.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article
Authors
Winters, L. Alan
McCulloch, Neil
McKay, Andrew
McCulloch, Neil
McKay, Andrew

