Name File Type Size Last Modified
  new-data-zip-file 09/14/2021 11:34:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 10:35:AM

Project Citation: 

Fischbacher, Urs, and Gachter, Simon. Replication data for: Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods Experiments. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112335V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary One lingering puzzle is why voluntary contributions to public goods decline over time in experimental and real-world settings. We show that the decline of cooperation is driven by individual preferences for imperfect conditional cooperation. Many people's desire to contribute less than others, rather than changing beliefs of what others will contribute over time or people's heterogeneity in preferences makes voluntary cooperation fragile. Universal free riding thus eventually emerges, despite the fact that most people are not selfish. (D12, D 83, H41, Z13)

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms social preferences; public goods; cooperation
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D12 Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
      D83 Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
      H41 Public Goods
      Z13 Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Switzerland
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data

Methodology

Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation repeated individual decisions,

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.