<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>vi</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Theory of Occupational Choice with Endogenous Fertility</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Dilip</gnm><snm>Mookherjee</snm><aff>Boston U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Silvia</gnm><snm>Prina</snm><aff>Case Western Reserve U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Debraj</gnm><snm>Ray</snm><aff>NYU</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>34</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Theories based on partial equilibrium reasoning alone cannot explain the widespread negative cross-sectional correlation between parental wages and fertility, without restrictive assumptions on preferences and childcare costs. We argue that incorporating a dynamic general equilibrium analysis of returns to human capital can help explain observed empirical patterns. Other by-products of this theory include explanations for intergenerational mobility without stochastic shocks, connections between mobility and fertility patterns, and locally determinate steady states. Comparative statics exercises on steady states shed light on the effects of education, childcare subsidies, child labor regulations, and income redistribution policy on long run living standards. (JEL H23, I31, J13, J24, J62, J82)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.1</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Evolutionary Selection of Individual Expectations and Aggregate Outcomes in Asset Pricing Experiments</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Mikhail</gnm><snm>Anufriev</snm><aff>U Technology Sydney</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Cars</gnm><snm>Hommes</snm><aff>CeNDEF, U Amsterdam</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>35</ppf>
<ppl>64</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In recent "learning to forecast" experiments (Hommes et al. 2005), three different patterns in aggregate price behavior have been observed: slow monotonic convergence, permanent oscillations, and dampened fluctuations. We show that a simple model of individual learning can explain these different aggregate outcomes within the same experimental setting. The key idea is evolutionary selection among heterogeneous expectation rules, driven by their relative performance. The out-of-sample predictive power of our switching
model is higher compared to the rational or other homogeneous expectations benchmarks. Our results show that heterogeneity in expectations is crucial to describe individual forecasting and aggregate price behavior. (JEL C53, C91, D83, D84, G12)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.35</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.35</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2011-0130_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2011-0130_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Information Acquisition in Competitive Markets: An Application to the US Mortgage Market</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Jeremy M.</gnm><snm>Burke</snm><aff>RAND Corporation, Arlington, VA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Curtis R.</gnm><snm>Taylor</snm><aff>Duke U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Liad</gnm><snm>Wagman</snm><aff>IL Institute of Technology</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>65</ppf>
<ppl>106</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>How do price commitments impact the amount of information firms acquire about potential customers? We examine this question in the context of a competitive market where firms search for information that may disqualify applicants. Contracts are incomplete because the amount of information acquired cannot be observed. Despite
competition, we find that firms search for too much information in equilibrium. If price discrimination is prohibited, members of high-risk groups suffer disproportionately high rejection rates. If rejected applicants remain in the market, the resulting adverse selection can be severe. We apply the results to the US mortgage market. (JEL D82, D83, D86, G21)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.65</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.65</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Auctions in Markets: Common Outside Options and the Continuation Value Effect</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Stephan</gnm><snm>Lauermann</snm><aff>U MI</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Gabor</gnm><snm>Virag</snm><aff>U Toronto</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>107</ppf>
<ppl>30</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In this paper, we study auctions with outside options provided by future market interaction focusing on the revenue effects of some information revelation policies. We show that auctions with less information revelation may yield higher revenues. In particular, we show that it is never optimal for the auctioneer to reveal information after the auction. Moreover, it is also not optimal to reveal information before the auction unless bidders already have precise information on their own. Our model provides a novel explanation for the
prevalence of opaque trading mechanisms, and it offers insights into
information sharing in dynamic models of trade. (JEL D44, D83)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.107</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.107</doi>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2012-0035_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Equity Aversion: Social Norms and the Desire to Be Ahead</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Chaim</gnm><snm>Fershtman</snm><aff>Tel Aviv U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Uri</gnm><snm>Gneezy</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego and CREED, U Amsterdam</aff></au>
<au><gnm>John A.</gnm><snm>List</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>131</ppf>
<ppl>44</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Inequity aversion models have dominated the behavioral economics landscape in the last decade. This study uses variants of dictator and trust games to provide empirical content to these models. We manipulate market features--such as competition over resources--to demonstrate that extant models cannot explain realistic manipulations of either game. For example, we show that if socially acceptable actions provide one player with a greater portion of the rents, she will put forth extra effort to secure them, to the detriment of the
other person. When she can earn more than the other player through customary actions, we find a preference for selfishness. (JEL C71, C70, D03, Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.131</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.131</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Christian A.</gnm><snm>Vossler</snm><aff>U TN</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Maurice</gnm><snm>Doyon</snm><aff>U Laval</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Daniel</gnm><snm>Rondeau</snm><aff>U Victoria</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>145</ppf>
<ppl>71</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper explores methodological issues surrounding the use of discrete
choice experiments to elicit values for public goods. We develop an explicit game theoretic model of individual decisions, providing conditions under which surveys with a single binary choice question, or sequence of binary choice questions, are incentive-compatible. We complement the theory with a framed field experiment, with treatments that span the spectrum from incentive-compatible, financially
binding decisions to decisions with no direct financial consequences. The results suggest truthful preference revelation is possible, provided that participants view their decisions as having more than a weak chance of influencing policy. (JEL C83, C93, H41, Q23)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.145</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.145</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2010-0142_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2010-0142_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Evolutionary Basis of Time Preference: Intergenerational Transfers and Sex</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Arthur J.</gnm><snm>Robson</snm><aff>Simon Fraser U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Balazs</gnm><snm>Szentes</snm><aff>London School of Economics and Political Science</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Emil</gnm><snm>Iantchev</snm><aff>Syracuse U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>172</ppf>
<ppl>201</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We consider the evolutionary basis of time discounting with intergenerational
transfers. We show that the notion of "reproductive value" from biology provides the utility criterion for a parent to optimize the allocation of resources between transfers to offspring and to promote her own survival. This optimization has a natural dynamic programming formulation. We show that younger individuals may well be "too impatient," but older individuals "too patient" in accordance with observations. We compare the allocation of resources under sexual reproduction to that where there is asexual reproduction. Sex distorts time discounting; under plausible conditions, sex increases patience. (JEL A12, D91)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.172</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.172</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>4</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>November 2012</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=4&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Competition, Comparative Performance, and Market Transparency</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Bruce I.</gnm><snm>Carlin</snm><aff>UCLA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Shaun William</gnm><snm>Davies</snm><aff>UCLA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Andrew</gnm><snm>Iannaccone</snm><aff>UCLA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>202</ppf>
<ppl>37</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We study how competition affects market transparency, taking into account that comparative performance is assessed via tournaments and contests. Extending Dye (1985) to a multi-firm setting in which
top performers are rewarded, we show that increased competition usually makes disclosure less likely, which lowers market transparency and may decrease per capita welfare. This result appears to be
robust to several model variations and as such, has implications for market regulation. (JEL D82, D83, L77, L25)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.4.4.202</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.4.4.202</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


