<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>vi</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Bankruptcy, Finance Constraints, and the Value of the Firm</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Douglas</gnm><snm>Gale</snm><aff>NYU</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Piero</gnm><snm>Gottardi</snm><aff>European U Institute, Florence and U Venice</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>37</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We study a competitive model in which market incompleteness implies that debt-financed firms may default in some states of nature, and default may lead to the sale of the firms' assets at fire sale prices when a finance constraint is binding. The anticipation of such "losses" alone may distort firms' investment decisions. We characterize the conditions under which fire sales occur in equilibrium, and their consequences on firms' investment decisions. We also show that endogenous financial crises may arise in this environment, with asset prices collapsing as a result of pure self-fulfilling beliefs. Finally, we examine alternative interventions to restore the efficiency of equilibria.
(JEL D83, G31, G32, G33)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.1</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Theory of Outsourcing and Wage Decline</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Thomas J.</gnm><snm>Holmes</snm><aff>U MN and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Julia Thornton</gnm><snm>Snider</snm><aff>UCLA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>38</ppf>
<ppl>59</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper develops a theory of outsourcing in which the circumstances
under which factors of production can grab rents play the leading role. One factor has monopoly power (call this labor) while a second factor does not (call this capital). There are two kinds of production tasks: labor-intensive and capital-intensive. We show that if frictions limiting outsourcing are not too large, in equilibrium labor-intensive tasks are separated from capital-intensive tasks into distinct firms. When a capital-intensive country is opened to free trade, outsourcing increases and labor rents decline. A decrease in outsourcing frictions lowers labor rents. (JEL J31, L22, L24)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.38</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.38</doi>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2009-0043_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Zeros, Quality, and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Richard</gnm><snm>Baldwin</snm><aff>Graduate Institute, Geneva</aff></au>
<au><gnm>James</gnm><snm>Harrigan</snm><aff>U VA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>60</ppf>
<ppl>88</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Bilateral, product-level data exhibit a number of strong patterns that can be used to evaluate international trade theories, notably the spatial incidence of "export zeros" (correlated with distance and importer size), and of export unit values (positively related to distance). We show that leading theoretical trade models fail to explain
at least some of these facts, and propose a variant of the Melitz model that can account for all the facts. In our model, high quality firms are the most competitive, with heterogeneous quality increasing with firms' heterogeneous cost. (JEL F11, F14, F40)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.60</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.60</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2009-0032_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2009-0032_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Principal-Agent Approach to Testing Experts</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Wojciech</gnm><snm>Olszewski</snm><aff>Northwestern U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Marcin</gnm><snm>Peski</snm><aff>U TX</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>89</ppf>
<ppl>113</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Recent literature on testing experts shows that it is often impossible to determine whether an expert knows the stochastic process that generates data. Despite this negative result, we show that there often exist contracts that allow a decision maker to attain the first-best payoff without learning the expert's type. This kind of full-surplus
extraction is always possible in infinite-horizon models in which future payoffs are not discounted. If future payoffs are discounted (but the discount factor tends to 1), the possibility of full-surplus extraction depends on a constraint involving the forecasting technology. (JEL D82)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.89</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.89</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Good News-Bad News Effect: Asymmetric Processing of Objective Information about Yourself</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>David</gnm><snm>Eil</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Justin M.</gnm><snm>Rao</snm><aff>Yahoo! Research Labs, Santa Clara, CA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>114</ppf>
<ppl>38</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We study processing and acquisition of objective information regarding qualities that people care about, intelligence and beauty. Subjects receiving negative feedback did not respect the strength of these signals, were far less predictable in their updating behavior and exhibited an aversion to new information. In response to good news, inference conformed more closely to Bayes' Rule, both in accuracy and precision. Signal direction did not affect updating or acquisition in our neutral control. Unlike past work, our design varied direction and agreement with priors independently. The results indicate that
confirmation bias is driven by direction; confirmation alone had no
effect. (JEL D82, D83)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.114</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.114</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2010-0077_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Taboos and Identity: Considering the Unthinkable</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Chaim</gnm><snm>Fershtman</snm><aff>Tel Aviv U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Uri</gnm><snm>Gneezy</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Moshe</gnm><snm>Hoffman</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>139</ppf>
<ppl>64</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>A taboo is an "unthinkable" action. Even the thought of violating a taboo triggers a punishment. We consider a model in which taboos are part of the definition of one's identity. Deliberating over breaking the taboo changes the individual's choice set, and provides information on possible private benefits. The strength of the taboo is determined by the number of individuals that obey it. We analyze the
relationship between social heterogeneity and taboos' strength. We
then examine societies in which individuals choose among several identities characterized by different taboos. We characterize the conditions that give rise to a multi-identity society. (JEL Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.139</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.139</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Economics of Contingent Re-auctions</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Sandro</gnm><snm>Brusco</snm><aff>Stony Brook U, SUNY</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Giuseppe</gnm><snm>Lopomo</snm><aff>Duke U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Leslie M.</gnm><snm>Marx</snm><aff>Duke U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>165</ppf>
<ppl>93</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We consider an auction environment where an object can be sold with usage restrictions that generate benefits to the seller but decrease buyers' valuations. In this environment, sellers such as the FCC have used "contingent re-auctions," offering the restricted object with a reserve price, but re-auctioning it without restrictions if the reserve is not met. We show that contingent re-auctions are generally neither efficient nor optimal for the seller. We propose an alternative "exclusive-buyer mechanism" that can implement the efficient outcome
in dominant strategies. In certain environments, parameters can be chosen so the seller's surplus is maximized across all selling procedures. (JEL D44, D82, H82)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.165</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.165</doi>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/app/2010-0040_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Exclusive Contracts, Innovation, and Welfare</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Yongmin</gnm><snm>Chen</snm><aff>U CO</aff></au>
<au><gnm>David E. M.</gnm><snm>Sappington</snm><aff>U FL</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>194</ppf>
<ppl>220</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We extend Philippe Aghion and Patrick Bolton's (1987) classic model to analyze the equilibrium incidence and impact of exclusive contracts in a setting where research and development (R&D) drives industry performance. An exclusive contract between an incumbent
supplier and a buyer arises when patent protection and/or the incumbent's R&D ability are sufficiently pronounced. The exclusive contract generally reduces the entrant's R&D, and can reduce the incumbent's R&D. Exclusive contracts reduce welfare if the incumbent's R&D ability is sufficiently limited, but can increase welfare if patent protection and the incumbent's R&D ability are sufficiently pronounced. (JEL D86, L14, O31)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.194</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.194</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Effect of Market Structure on Cellular Technology Adoption and Pricing</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Katja</gnm><snm>Seim</snm><aff>U PA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>V. Brian</gnm><snm>Viard</snm><aff>Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, Beijing</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>221</ppf>
<ppl>51</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We examine how structural changes in the mobile telecommunications industry between 1996, when local markets were duopolies, and 1998, when varying degrees of regulated entry had occurred,
affected firms' product offerings and nonlinear pricing strategies. We relate firms' digital technology adoption and the characteristics of their calling plan menus to the amount of entry in local markets. We find that entry induces firms to offer larger menus with more evenly spread plans, both directly and by accelerating the introduction of digital menus with such features. Prices decline with entry, in particular for high-valuation consumers who benefit from steeper quantity discounts. (JEL L11, L13, L96, L98, O33)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.221</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.221</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/data/2008-0073_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7669</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7685</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Microeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-micro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>3</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>May 2011</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MIC&volume=3&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Corrigendum: Sex Selection and Gender Balance</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>V.</gnm><snm>Bhaskar</snm><aff>U College London</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>252</ppf>
<ppl>53</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.3.2.252</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mic.3.2.252</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


 