<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>ii</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Optimal Monetary Policy Rules in an Estimated Sticky-Information Model</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Ricardo</gnm><snm>Reis</snm><aff>Columbia U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>28</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper uses a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE)
model with sticky information as a laboratory to study monetary
policy. It characterizes the model's predictions for macro dynamics
and optimal policy at prior parameters, and then uses data on
five US macroeconomic series to update the parameters and provide
an estimated model that can be used for policy analysis. The
model answers a few policy questions. How does sticky information
affect optimal monetary policy? What is the optimal interest rate
rule? What is the optimal elastic price-level targeting rule? How
does parameter uncertainty affect optimal policy? Are the conclusions
for the Euro area different? (JEL E13, E31, E43, E52)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.1</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0077_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Can a Representative-Agent Model Represent a Heterogeneous-Agent Economy</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Sungbae</gnm><snm>An</snm><aff>Singapore Management U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Yongsung</gnm><snm>Chang</snm><aff>U Rochester and Yonsei U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Sun-Bin</gnm><snm>Kim</snm><aff>Korea U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>29</ppf>
<ppl>54</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Accounting for observed fluctuations in aggregate employment, consumption,
and real wage using the optimality conditions of a representative
household requires preferences that are incompatible with
economic priors. In order to reconcile theory with data, we construct
a model with heterogeneous agents whose decisions are difficult to
aggregate because of incomplete capital markets and the indivisible
nature of labor supply. If we were to explain the model-generated
aggregate time series using decisions of a stand-in household, such
a household must have a nonconcave or unstable utility as is often
found with the aggregate US data. (JEL E13, E24)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.29</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.29</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0041_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Hit or Miss? The Effect of Assassinations on Institutions and War</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Benjamin F.</gnm><snm>Jones</snm><aff>Northwestern U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Benjamin A.</gnm><snm>Olken</snm><aff>MIT</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>55</ppf>
<ppl>87</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Assassinations are a persistent feature of the political landscape.
Using a new dataset of assassination attempts on all world leaders
from 1875 to 2004, we exploit inherent randomness in the success
or failure of assassination attempts to identify the effects of assassination.
We find that, on average, successful assassinations of
autocrats produce sustained moves toward democracy. We also find
that assassinations affect the intensity of small-scale conflicts. The
results document a contemporary source of institutional change,
inform theories of conflict, and show that small sources of randomness
can have a pronounced effect on history. (JEL D72, N40, O17)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.55</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.55</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0058_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Democratic Capital: The Nexus of Political and Economic Change</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Torsten</gnm><snm>Persson</snm><aff>IIES, Stockholm U and London School of Economics</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Guido</gnm><snm>Tabellini</snm><aff>IGIER, U Bocconi and CESifo, Munich</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>88</ppf>
<ppl>126</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We study the dynamics of economic and political change, theoretically
and empirically. Democratic capital measured by a nation's
historical experience with democracy, and the incidence of democracy
in its neighborhood, appears to reduce exit rates from democracy
and raise exit rates from autocracy. Higher democratic
capital stimulates growth by increasing the stability of democracies.
Heterogeneous effects of democracy induce sorting of countries into
political regimes, which helps explain systematic differences between
democracies and autocracies. Our results suggest the possibility of
a virtuous circle, where accumulation of physical and democratic
capital reinforce each other, promoting economic development and
consolidation of democracy. (JEL D72, I31, N10, N40, O47)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.88</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.88</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2007-0049_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/app/2007-0049_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Understanding the Forward Premium Puzzle: A Microstructure Approach</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Craig</gnm><snm>Burnside</snm><aff>Duke U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Martin</gnm><snm>Eichenbaum</snm><aff>Northwestern U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Sergio</gnm><snm>Rebelo</snm><aff>Northwestern U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>127</ppf>
<ppl>54</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>High interest rate currencies tend to appreciate relative to low
interest rate currencies. We argue that adverse selection problems
between participants in foreign exchange markets can account for
this "forward premium puzzle." The key feature of our model is that
the adverse selection problem facing market makers is worse when
an agent wants to trade against a public information signal. So, when
based on public information, the currency is expected to appreciate,
there is more adverse selection associated with a sell order than with
a buy order. (JEL E43, F31, G15)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.127</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.127</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0028_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The International Diversification Puzzle When Goods Prices Are Sticky: It's Really about Exchange-Rate Hedging, Not Equity Portfolios</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Charles</gnm><snm>Engel</snm><aff>U WI</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Akito</gnm><snm>Matsumoto</snm><aff>IMF</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>155</ppf>
<ppl>88</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper develops a two-country monetary DSGE model in which
households choose a portfolio of home and foreign equities, and a
forward position in foreign exchange. Some nominal goods prices
are sticky. Trade in these assets achieves the same allocations as
trade in a complete set of nominal state-contingent claims in our
linearized model. When there is a high degree of price stickiness, we
show that not much equity diversification is required to replicate the
complete-markets equilibrium when agents are able to hedge foreign
exchange risk sufficiently. Moreover, temporarily sticky nominal
goods prices can have large effects on equity portfolios even when
dividend processes are very persistent. (JEL E13, F41, G11, G15)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.155</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.155</doi>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/app/2007-0011_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Century of Work and Leisure</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Valerie A.</gnm><snm>Ramey</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Neville</gnm><snm>Francis</snm><aff>U NC</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>189</ppf>
<ppl>224</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We develop comprehensive measures of time spent in market work,
home production, schooling, and leisure in the United States for the
last 106 years. We find that hours of work for prime age individuals
are essentially unchanged, with the rise in women's hours fully compensating
for the decline in men's hours. Hours worked by those 14
to 24 years old have declined noticeably, but most of this decline was
offset by a rise in hours spent in school. Overall, per capita leisure
and average annual lifetime leisure increased by only four or five
hours per week during the last 100 years. (JEL D13, J16, J22)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.189</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.189</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2007-0035_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>How Is Foreign Aid Spent? Evidence from a Natural Experiment</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Eric</gnm><snm>Werker</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Faisal Z.</gnm><snm>Ahmed</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Charles</gnm><snm>Cohen</snm><aff>Sankaty Advisors, Boston, MA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>225</ppf>
<ppl>44</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We use oil price fluctuations to test the impact of transfers from
wealthy OPEC nations to their poorer Muslim allies. The instrument
identifies plausibly exogenous variation in foreign aid. We investigate
how aid is spent by tracking its short-run effect on aggregate
demand, national accounts, and balance of payments. Aid affects
most components of GDP though it has no statistically identifiable
impact on prices or economic growth. Much aid is consumed, primarily
in the form of imported noncapital goods. Aid substitutes for
domestic savings, has no effect on the financial account, and leads
to unaccounted capital flight. (JEL F35, O19)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.2.225</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.2.225</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2007-0057_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>



