<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Border Effect or Country Effect? Seattle May Not Be So Far from Vancouver After All</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Yuriy</gnm><snm>Gorodnichenko</snm><aff>U CA, Berkeley</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Linda L.</gnm><snm>Tesar</snm><aff>U MI</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>219</ppf>
<ppl>41</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper reexamines the evidence on the border effect. We argue
that if there is cross-country heterogeneity in the distribution of
within-country price differentials, there is no clear benchmark from
which to gauge the effect of a border. In the absence of a structural
model or a (natural) experiment, it is impossible to separate
the "border" effect from the effect of trading with a country with a
different distribution of prices. We show that the border effect identified
by Engel and Rogers (1996) is entirely driven by the difference
in the distribution of prices within the United States and Canada.
(JEL F11, F14)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.219</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.219</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Rent Preservation and the Persistence of Underdevelopment</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Raghuram G.</gnm><snm>Rajan</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>178</ppf>
<ppl>218</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>When citizens in a poor constrained society are unequally endowed,
they are likely to find it hard to agree on reforms, even though the
status quo hurts them collectively. Each citizen group or constituency
prefers reforms that expand its opportunities, but in an unequal society,
this will typically hurt another constituency's rents. Competitive
rent preservation ensures no comprehensive reform path may command
broad support. The roots of underdevelopment may therefore
lie in the natural tendency toward rent preservation in a divided
society. (JEL D72, O10, O17)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.178</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.178</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2007-0041_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Raquel</gnm><snm>Fernandez</snm><aff>NYU and IZA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Alessandra</gnm><snm>Fogli</snm><aff>U MN</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>146</ppf>
<ppl>77</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We study culture by examining the work and fertility behavior of
second-generation American women. Culture is proxied with past
female labor force participation and total fertility rates from the
woman's country of ancestry. The values of these variables capture
not only economic and institutional conditions but also the country's
preferences and beliefs regarding women's roles. Since the women
live in the United States, only the belief and preference components
are potentially relevant. We show that the cultural proxies have positive
significant explanatory power even after controlling for education
and spousal characteristics, and we demonstrate that the results
are unlikely to be explained by unobserved human capital. (JEL: J13,
J16, J22, J24, Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.146</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.146</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Yann</gnm><snm>Algan</snm><aff>Paris East U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Pierre</gnm><snm>Cahuc</snm><aff>Ecole Polytechnique, Malakoff</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>111</ppf>
<ppl>45</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We argue civic virtue plays a key role in explaining the design of public
insurance against unemployment risks by solving moral hazard
issues which hinder the efficiency of unemployment insurance. We
show, in a simple model, that economies with stronger civic virtues
are more prone to provide insurance through unemployment benefits
rather than through job protection. We provide cross-country
empirical evidence of a strong correlation between civic attitudes
and the design of unemployment benefits and employment protection
in OECD countries over the period 1980 to 2003. We then use
an epidemiological approach to estimate the existence of a potential
causal relationship from inherited civic virtue to labor market insurance
institutions. (JEL: J41, J65, J68, Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.111</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.111</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/data/2007-0002_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Ins and Outs of Cyclical Unemployment</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Michael W. L.</gnm><snm>Elsby</snm><aff>U MI</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Ryan</gnm><snm>Michaels</snm><aff>U MI</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Gary</gnm><snm>Solon</snm><aff>MI State U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>84</ppf>
<ppl>110</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>A dominant trend in recent modeling of labor market fluctuations is to
treat unemployment inflows as acyclical. This trend has been encouraged
by recent influential papers that stress the role of longer unemployment
spells, rather than more unemployment spells, in accounting
for recessionary unemployment. After reviewing an empirical literature
going back several decades, we apply a convenient log change
decomposition to Current Population Survey data to characterize
rising unemployment in each postwar recession. We conclude that a
complete understanding of cyclical unemployment requires an explanation
of countercyclical inflow rates, especially for job losers (layoffs),
as well as procyclical outflow rates. (JEL E24, E32)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.84</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.84</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2007-0013_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Black Swan in the Money Market</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>John B.</gnm><snm>Taylor</snm><aff>Stanford U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>John C.</gnm><snm>Williams</snm><aff>Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>58</ppf>
<ppl>83</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>The recent financial crisis saw a dramatic and persistent jump in
interest rate spreads between overnight federal funds and longer -
term interbank loans. The Fed took several actions to reduce these
spreads including the creation of the Term Auction Facility (TAF). The
effectiveness of these policies depends on the cause of the increased
spreads such as counterparty risk, liquidity, or other factors. Using
a no-arbitrage pricing framework and various measures of risk, we
find robust evidence that increased counterparty risk contributed to
the rise in spreads but do not find robust evidence that the TAF had
a significant effect on spreads. (JEL E43, E44, E52, G21)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.58</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.58</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0048_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>On the Sources of the Great Moderation</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Jordi</gnm><snm>Gal&iacute;</snm><aff>CREI, U Pompeu Fabra</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Luca</gnm><snm>Gambetti</snm><aff>U Autonoma de Barcelona</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>26</ppf>
<ppl>57</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>The Great Moderation in the US economy has been accompanied by
large changes in the comovements among output, hours, and labor
productivity. Those changes are reflected in both conditional and
unconditional second moments as well as in the impulse responses
to identified shocks. Among other changes, our findings point to an
increase in the volatility of hours relative to output, a shrinking contribution
of nontechnology shocks to output volatility, and a change
in the cyclical response of labor productivity to those shocks. That
evidence suggests a more complex picture than that associated with
"good luck" explanations of the Great Moderation. (JEL: E23, E24,
J22, J24)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.26</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.26</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/data/2007-0005_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Trade and the Diffusion of the Industrial Revolution</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Robert E.</gnm><snm>Lucas</snm><aff>Chicago, IL</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>25</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper proposes a model to describe the evolution of real gross
domestic product (GDP) in the world economy that is intended to
apply to all open economies. The parameters of the model are calibrated
using evidence from Sachs and Warner on economies classed
as open, from Parente and Prescott on economies that have successfully
begun to develop, and from Kuznets and the World Bank on the
employment share of agriculture in various times and places. The
theory predicts convergence of the income levels and growth rates in
the open economies and has strong but reasonable implications for
transition dynamics. (JEL F41, O33, O47)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.1</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Editor's Note</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Olivier</gnm><snm>Blanchard</snm><aff>MIT</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>iii</ppf>
<ppl>iv</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.iii</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.iii</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Symposium</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>New Keynesian Models: Not Yet Useful for Policy Analysis</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>V. V.</gnm><snm>Chari</snm><aff>Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and U MN</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Patrick J.</gnm><snm>Kehoe</snm><aff>Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and U MN</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Ellen R.</gnm><snm>McGrattan</snm><aff>Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and U MN</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>242</ppf>
<ppl>66</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Macroeconomists have largely converged on method, model design,
reduced-form shocks, and principles of policy advice. Our main disagreements
today are about implementing the methodology. Some
think New Keynesian models are ready to be used for quarter-to-quarter
quantitative policy advice. We do not. Focusing on the state-of-
the-art version of these models, we argue that some of its shocks
and other features are not structural or consistent with microeconomic
evidence. Since an accurate structural model is essential
to reliably evaluate the effects of policies, we conclude that New
Keynesian models are not yet useful for policy analysis. (JEL E12,
E60)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.242</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.242</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mac/data/2008-0044_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Symposium</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Convergence in Macroeconomics: Elements of the New Synthesis</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Michael</gnm><snm>Woodford</snm><aff>Columbia U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>267</ppf>
<ppl>79</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>While macroeconomics is often thought of as a deeply divided field,
with less of a shared core and correspondingly less cumulative progress
than other areas of economics, in fact, there are fewer fundamental
disagreements among macroeconomists now than in past
decades. This is due to important progress in resolving seemingly
intractable debates. In this paper, I review some of those debates
and outline important elements of the new synthesis in macroeconomic
theory. I discusses the extent to which the new developments
in theory and research methods are already affecting macroeconomic
analysis in policy institutions. (JEL A11, E00)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.267</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.267</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Symposium</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Convergence in Macroeconomics: The Labor Wedge</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Robert</gnm><snm>Shimer</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>280</ppf>
<ppl>97</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>I review research on the behavior of the labor wedge, the ratio
between the marginal rate of substitution of consumption for leisure
and the marginal product of labor. According to competitive,
market-clearing macroeconomic models, the ratio is easy to measure
and should be equal to the sum of consumption and labor taxes.
The observation that the wedge is higher in continental Europe than
in the United States has proved useful for understanding the extent
to which taxes can explain differences in labor market outcomes.
The observation that the ratio rises during recessions suggests some
failure of competitive, market-clearing macroeconomic models at
business cycle frequencies. The latter observation has guided recent
research, including work on sticky wage models and job search models.
(JEL E24, E32, J64)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.280</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.280</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7707</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7715</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-macro/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=MAC&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>ii</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mac.1.1.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/mac.1.1.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>



