<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Malaria Eradication in the Americas: A Retrospective Analysis of Childhood Exposure</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Hoyt</gnm><snm>Bleakley</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>45</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This study uses the malaria-eradication campaigns in the United
States (circa 1920) and in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico (circa 1955)
to measure how much childhood exposure to malaria depresses
labor productivity. The campaigns began because of advances in
health technology, which mitigates concerns about reverse causality.
Malarious areas saw large drops in the disease thereafter. Relative
to non-malarious areas, cohorts born after eradication had higher
income as adults than the preceding generation. These cross-cohort
changes coincided with childhood exposure to the campaigns rather
than to pre-existing trends. Estimates suggest a substantial, though
not predominant, role for malaria in explaining cross-region differences
in income. (JEL I12, I18, J13, O15)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.1</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0126_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2008-0126_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Malaria Eradication and Educational Attainment: Evidence from Paraguay and Sri Lanka</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Adrienne M.</gnm><snm>Lucas</snm><aff>Wellesley College</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>46</ppf>
<ppl>71</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Mid-twentieth century malaria eradication campaigns largely eliminated
malaria from Paraguay and Sri Lanka. Using these interventions
as quasi-experiments, I estimate malaria's effect on lifetime
female educational attainment through the combination of pre-existing
geographic variation in malarial intensity and cohort exposure
based on the timing of the national anti-malaria campaigns. The
estimates from Sri Lanka and Paraguay are similar and indicate
that malaria eradication increased years of educational attainment
and literacy. The similarity of the estimates across the countries
reinforces our confidence in the validity of the identification strategy.
(JEL I12, I18, I21, J16, O15, O18)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.46</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.46</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0087_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Early-Life Malaria Exposure and Adult Outcomes: Evidence from Malaria Eradication in India</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>David</gnm><snm>Cutler</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Winnie</gnm><snm>Fung</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Michael</gnm><snm>Kremer</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Monica</gnm><snm>Singhal</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Tom</gnm><snm>Vogl</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>72</ppf>
<ppl>94</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We examine the effects of exposure to malaria in early childhood
on educational attainment and economic status in adulthood by
exploiting geographic variation in malaria prevalence in India prior
to a nationwide eradication program in the 1950s. We find that the
program led to modest increases in household per capita consumption
for prime age men, and the effects for men are larger than those
for women in most specifications. We find no evidence of increased
educational attainment for men and mixed evidence for women.
(JEL I12, I18, I21, 015, 018)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.72</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.72</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0058_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2007-0058_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Ability, Gender, and Performance Standards: Evidence from Academic Probation</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Jason M.</gnm><snm>Lindo</snm><aff>U OR</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Nicholas J.</gnm><snm>Sanders</snm><aff>U CA, Davis</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Philip</gnm><snm>Oreopoulos</snm><aff>U British Columbia</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>95</ppf>
<ppl>117</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We use a regression discontinuity design to examine students'
responses to being placed on academic probation. Consistent with
a model of introducing performance standards, we find that being
placed on probation at the end of the first year discourages some
students from returning to school while improving the GPAs of
those who do. We find heterogeneous responses across prior academic
performance, gender, and native language, and discuss these
results within the context of the model. We also find negative effects
on graduation rates, particularly for students with the highest high
school grades. (JEL I23, J16)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.95</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.95</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0202_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Modern Medicine and the Twentieth Century Decline in Mortality: Evidence on the Impact of Sulfa Drugs</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Seema</gnm><snm>Jayachandran</snm><aff>Stanford U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Adriana</gnm><snm>Lleras-Muney</snm><aff>UCLA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Kimberly V.</gnm><snm>Smith</snm><aff>Mathematica Policy Research, Princeton, NJ</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>118</ppf>
<ppl>46</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper studies the contribution of sulfa drugs, a groundbreaking
medical innovation in the 1930s, to declines in US mortality. For
several infectious diseases, sulfa drugs represented the first effective
treatment. Using time-series and difference-in-differences methods,
we find that sulfa drugs led to a 24 to 36 percent decline in maternal
mortality, 17 to 32 percent decline in pneumonia mortality, and 52
to 65 percent decline in scarlet fever mortality between 1937 and
1943. Altogether, sulfa drugs reduced mortality by 2 to 3 percent and
increased life expectancy by 0.4 to 0.7 years. We also find that sulfa
drugs benefited whites more than blacks. (JEL I12, L65, N32, N72)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.118</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.118</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0229_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2008-0229_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Information, Preferences, and Public Benefit Participation: Experimental Evidence from the Advance EITC and 401(k) Savings</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Damon</gnm><snm>Jones</snm><aff>Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford U and U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>147</ppf>
<ppl>63</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Within a field experiment, I present a treatment group with reductions
in information, administrative, stigma, and procrastination
costs associated with the Advance EITC. The treatment increases
Advance participation from 0.3 to 1.2 percent. Another treatment
simultaneously encourages 401(k) savings, increasing 401(k) participation
from 46 to 50 percent. However, there is no additional
increase in Advance participation when coupled with the 401(k)
treatment, casting doubt on a long-term forced savings motive. The
results indicate that EITC recipients actively forgo the Advance.
Further work is needed to identify what underlies these preferences.
Possible explanations include uncertainty and/or short-term forced
savings motives. (JEL D14, D82, H23, H24, H31)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.147</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.147</doi>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2008-0124_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Promoting Healthy Choices: Information versus Convenience</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Jessica</gnm><snm>Wisdom</snm><aff>Carnegie Mellon U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Julie S.</gnm><snm>Downs</snm><aff>Carnegie Mellon U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>George</gnm><snm>Loewenstein</snm><aff>Carnegie Mellon U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>164</ppf>
<ppl>78</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Success in slowing obesity trends would benefit from policies aimed
at reducing calorie consumption. In a field experiment at a fast-food
sandwich chain, we address the effects of providing calorie information,
mimicking recent legislation, and test an alternative approach
that makes ordering healthier slightly more convenient. We find that
calorie information reduces calorie intake. Providing a daily calorie
target does as well, but only for non-overweight individuals. Making
healthy choices convenient reduces intake when the intervention is
strong. However, a milder implementation reduces sandwich calories,
but does not reduce total calories due to compensatory effects
on side orders and drinks. (JEL I12, I18, L81)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.164</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.164</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0129_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Disclosure by Politicians</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Simeon</gnm><snm>Djankov</snm><aff>World Bank</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Rafael</gnm><snm>La Porta</snm><aff>Dartmouth College</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Florencio</gnm><snm>Lopez-de-Silanes</snm><aff>EDHEC Business School</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Andrei</gnm><snm>Shleifer</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>179</ppf>
<ppl>209</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We collect data on the rules and practices of financial and conflict
disclosure by members of Parliament in 175 countries. Although two-thirds
of the countries have some disclosure laws, less than one-third
make disclosures available to the public, and less than one-sixth of
potentially useful information is publicly available in practice, on
average. Countries that are richer, more democratic, and have free
press have more disclosure. Public disclosure, but not internal disclosure
to parliament, is positively related to government quality,
including lower corruption. (JEL J13, I21, I12)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.179</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.179</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2009-0187_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Roland G.</gnm><snm>Fryer</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Steven D.</gnm><snm>Levitt</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>210</ppf>
<ppl>40</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We document and analyze the emergence of a substantial gender gap
in mathematics in the early years of schooling using a large, recent,
and nationally representative panel of US children. There are no
mean differences between boys and girls upon entry to school, but
girls lose more than two-tenths of a standard deviation relative to
boys over the first six years of school. The ground lost by girls relative
to boys is roughly half as large as the black-white test score gap
that appears over these same ages. We document the presence of this
gender math gap across every strata of society. We explore a wide
range of possible explanations in the data, including less investment
by girls in math, low parental expectations, and biased tests, but
find little support for these theories. Moving to cross-country comparisons,
we find earlier results linking the gender gap in math to
measures of gender equality are sensitive to the inclusion of Muslim
countries, where, in spite of women's low status, there is little or no
gender gap in math. (JEL I23, J26)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.210</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.210</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2009-0195_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Identification of Social Interactions through Partially Overlapping Peer Groups</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Giacomo</gnm><snm>De Giorgi</snm><aff>Stanford U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Michele</gnm><snm>Pellizzari</snm><aff>Bocconi U and IGIER</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Silvia</gnm><snm>Redaelli</snm><aff>Bocconi U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>241</ppf>
<ppl>75</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In this paper, we demonstrate that, in a context where peer groups
do not overlap fully, it is possible to identify all the relevant parameters
of the standard linear-in-means model of social interactions.
We apply this novel identification structure to study peer effects in
the choice of college major. Results show that one is more likely
to choose a major when many of her peers make the same choice.
We also show that peers can divert students from majors in which
they have a relative ability advantage, with adverse consequences
on academic performance, entry wages, and job satisfaction. (JEL
I23, J24, J31, Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.241</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.241</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2009-0137_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2009-0137_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>2</vol>
<iss>2</iss>
<cd>April 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=2&issue=2</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter and Editor's Note</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>iv</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.2.2.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.2.2.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


