<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>ii</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Are Women More Credit Constrained? Experimental Evidence on Gender and Microenterprise Returns</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Suresh</gnm><snm>de Mel</snm><aff>U Peradeniya</aff></au>
<au><gnm>David</gnm><snm>McKenzie</snm><aff>World Bank</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Christopher</gnm><snm>Woodruff</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>32</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We report on a field experiment providing random grants to microenterprise
owners. The grants generated large profit increases for male
owners but not for female owners. We show that the gender gap does
not simply mask differences in ability, risk aversion, entrepreneurial
attitudes, or differences in reporting behavior, but there is some evidence
that the gender gap is larger in female-dominated industries.
The data are not consistent with a unitary household model, and
imply an inefficiency of resource allocation within households. We
show evidence that this inefficiency is reduced in more cooperative
households. (JEL D13, D14, J16, L25, L26, O12, O16)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.1</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0146_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Effect of Grade Retention on High School Completion</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Brian A.</gnm><snm>Jacob</snm><aff>U MI</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Lars</gnm><snm>Lefgren</snm><aff>Brigham Young U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>33</ppf>
<ppl>58</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Low-achieving students in many school districts are retained in a
grade to allow them to gain the academic or social skills that teachers
believe are necessary to succeed academically. In this paper,
we use plausibly exogenous variation in retention generated by a
test-based promotion policy to assess the causal impact of grade
retention on high school completion. We find that retention among
younger students does not affect the likelihood of high school completion,
but that retaining low-achieving eighth grade students in
elementary school substantially increases the probability that these
students will drop out of high school. (JEL I21, J13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.33</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.33</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0053_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2007-0053_app.zip</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Legal Reform and Loan Repayment: The Microeconomic Impact of Debt Recovery Tribunals in India</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Sujata</gnm><snm>Visaria</snm><aff>Boston U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>59</ppf>
<ppl>81</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In 1993, the Indian government introduced debt recovery tribunals
to speed up the resolution of debt recovery claims larger than
a threshold. This paper exploits the staggered introduction of tribunals
across states and the link between overdues and claim size
to implement a differences-in-differences strategy on project loan
data. It finds that the tribunals reduced delinquency for the average
loan by 28 percent. They also lowered the interest rates charged on
larger loans, holding constant borrower quality. This suggests that
the speedier processing of debt recovery suits can lower the cost of
credit. (JEL G21, K41, O16, O17)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.59</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.59</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0032_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Smuggling of Art, and the Art of Smuggling: Uncovering the Illicit Trade in Cultural Property and Antiques</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Raymond</gnm><snm>Fisman</snm><aff>Columbia U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Shang-Jin</gnm><snm>Wei</snm><aff>Columbia U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>82</ppf>
<ppl>96</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We empirically analyze the illicit trade in cultural property and
antiques, taking advantage of different reporting incentives between
source and destination countries. We generate a measure of illicit
trafficking in these goods by comparing imports recorded in United
States' customs data and the (purportedly identical) trade recorded
by customs authorities in exporting countries. This reporting gap
is highly correlated with corruption levels of exporting countries.
This correlation is stronger for artifact-rich countries. As a placebo
test, we do not observe any such pattern for US imports of toys. We
report similar results for four other Western country markets. (JEL
F14, K42, Z11, Z13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.82</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.82</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0093_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>To Work or Not to Work? Child Development and Maternal Labor Supply</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Paul</gnm><snm>Frijters</snm><aff>Queensland U Technology</aff></au>
<au><gnm>David W.</gnm><snm>Johnston</snm><aff>Queensland U Technology</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Manisha</gnm><snm>Shah</snm><aff>U Melbourne</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Michael A.</gnm><snm>Shields</snm><aff>U Melbourne</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>97</ppf>
<ppl>110</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We estimate the effect of early child development on maternal labor
force participation. Mothers of poorly developing children may
remain at home to care for their children. Alternatively, mothers
may enter the labor force to pay for additional educational and
health resources. Which action dominates is the empirical question
we answer in this paper. We control for the potential endogeneity
of child development by using an instrumental variables approach,
uniquely exploiting exogenous variation in child development associated
with child handedness. We find that a one unit increase in
poor child development decreases maternal labor force participation
by approximately 10 percentage points. (JEL J13, J16, J22)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.97</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.97</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0143_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Early Childhood Intervention and Life-Cycle Skill Development: Evidence from Head Start</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>David</gnm><snm>Deming</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>111</ppf>
<ppl>34</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper provides new evidence on the long-term benefits of Head
Start using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. I compare
siblings who differ in their participation in the program, controlling
for a variety of pre-treatment covariates. I estimate that Head Start
participants gain 0.23 standard deviations on a summary index of
young adult outcomes. This closes one-third of the gap between children
with median and bottom quartile family income, and is about
80 percent as large as model programs such as Perry Preschool. The
long-term impact for disadvantaged children is large despite "fadeout"
of test score gains. (JEL H52, J13, I28, I38)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.111</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.111</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0217_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Task Specialization, Immigration, and Wages</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Giovanni</gnm><snm>Peri</snm><aff>U CA, Davis</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Chad</gnm><snm>Sparber</snm><aff>Colgate U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>135</ppf>
<ppl>69</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Large inflows of less educated immigrants may reduce wages paid
to comparably-educated, native-born workers. However, if less educated
foreign- and native-born workers specialize in different production
tasks, because of different abilities, immigration will cause
natives to reallocate their task supply, thereby reducing downward
wage pressure. Using occupational task-intensity data from the
O*NET dataset and individual US census data, we demonstrate that
foreign-born workers specialize in occupations intensive in manual-physical
labor skills while natives pursue jobs more intensive in
communication-language tasks. This mechanism can explain why
economic analyses find only modest wage consequences of immigration
for less educated native-born workers. (JEL J24, J31, J61)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.135</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.135</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0057_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2008-0057_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>July 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>HIV/AIDS and Fertility</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Jane G.</gnm><snm>Fortson</snm><aff>Mathematica Policy Research, Inc, Oakland, CA</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>170</ppf>
<ppl>94</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper studies the response of fertility to the HIV/AIDS epidemic
in sub-Saharan Africa. I use repeated cross sections of the
Demographic and Health Surveys for 12 countries in sub-Saharan
Africa to examine this question empirically. Using individual birth
histories from these data, I construct estimates of the regional total
fertility rate over time. In a difference-in-differences approach, I
compare regional HIV prevalence to changes in total fertility rates
from the 1980s to the present. My results suggest that HIV/AIDS had
very little impact on fertility, both overall and in a sample of HIV-negative
women. (JEL I12, J13, O12)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.3.170</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.3.170</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2008-0199_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


