<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Effect of Alcohol Consumption on Mortality: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from the Minimum Drinking Age</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Christopher</gnm><snm>Carpenter</snm><aff>U CA, Irvine</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Carlos</gnm><snm>Dobkin</snm><aff>U CA, Santa Cruz</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>164</ppf>
<ppl>82</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We estimate the effect of alcohol consumption on mortality using
the minimum drinking age in a regression discontinuity design. We
find large and immediate increases in drinking at age 21, including
a 21 percent increase in recent drinking days. We also find a
discrete 9 percent increase in the mortality rate at age 21, primarily
due to motor vehicle accidents, alcohol-related deaths, and suicides.
We estimate a 10 percent increase in the number of drinking days
for young adults results in a 4.3 percent increase in mortality. Our
results suggest policies that reduce drinking among young adults
can have substantial public health benefits. (JEL I12, I18)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.164</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.164</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0089_data.zip</dataset>
<addt_matl_link>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/app/2007-0089_app.pdf</addtl_matl_link>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Biological Gender Differences, Absenteeism, and the Earnings Gap</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Andrea</gnm><snm>Ichino</snm><aff>U Bologna</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Enrico</gnm><snm>Moretti</snm><aff>U CA, Berkeley</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>183</ppf>
<ppl>218</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In most countries, women are absent from work more frequently
than men. Using personnel data, we find that the absences of women
below the age of 45 follow a 28-day cycle, while the absences of
men and of women over the age of 45 do not. We interpret this as
evidence that the menstrual cycle increases female absenteeism. To
investigate the effect on women's earnings, we use a simple model of
statistical discrimination. Consistent with the model, we find absenteeism
has a more negative effect on men's earnings and this difference
declines with seniority. The increased absenteeism induced by
the 28-day cycle explains at least 14 percent of the earnings gender
differential. (JEL J16, J22, J31)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.183</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.183</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0091_data.doc</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Fixing Market Failures or Fixing Elections? Agricultural Credit in India</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Shawn</gnm><snm>Cole</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>219</ppf>
<ppl>50</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper integrates theories of political budget cycles with theories
of tactical electoral redistribution to test for political capture in a
novel way. Studying banks in India, I find that government-owned
bank lending tracks the electoral cycle, with agricultural credit
increasing by 5-10 percentage points in an election year. There is
significant cross-sectional targeting, with large increases in districts
in which the election is particularly close. This targeting does not
occur in nonelection years or in private bank lending. I show capture
is costly: elections affect loan repayment, and election-year credit
booms do not measurably affect agricultural output. (JEL D72, O13,
O17, Q14, Q18)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.219</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.219</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0054_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Social Multiplier and Labor Market Participation of Mothers</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Eric</gnm><snm>Maurin</snm><aff>Paris School of Economics</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Julie</gnm><snm>Moschion</snm><aff>Paris School of Economics</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>251</ppf>
<ppl>72</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In France, as in the US, a mother's labor market participation is
influenced by the sex composition of her two eldest siblings. This
paper shows that it is also affected by the sex composition of the
eldest siblings of the other mothers living in the same close neighborhood.
Using the sex composition of neighbors' eldest siblings as
an instrumental variable, we identify a significant elasticity of own
labor market participation to neighbors' participation. We present
supportive evidence by comparing the estimates under two regimes
for family benefits (pre- and post-1994 reform) and using quarter of
birth as an alternative instrument. (JEL J16, J22)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.251</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.251</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/app/data/2007-0088_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Paul</gnm><snm>Glewwe</snm><aff>U MN, St Paul</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Michael</gnm><snm>Kremer</snm><aff>Harvard U and Center for Global Development</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Sylvie</gnm><snm>Moulin</snm><aff>Rabat American School</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>112</ppf>
<ppl>35</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>A randomized evaluation in rural Kenya finds, contrary to the
previous literature, that providing textbooks did not raise average
test scores. Textbooks did increase the scores of the best students
(those with high pretest scores) but had little effect on other students.
Textbooks are written in English, most students' third language,
and many students could not use them effectively. More generally,
the curriculum in Kenya, and in many other developing countries,
tends to be oriented toward academically strong students, leaving
many students behind in societies that combine a centralized educational
system; the heterogeneity in student preparation associated
with rapid educational expansion; and disproportionate elite power.
(JEL O15, I21, I28, J13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.112</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.112</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0011_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Incentives and Services for College Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Trial</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Joshua</gnm><snm>Angrist</snm><aff>MIT</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Daniel</gnm><snm>Lang</snm><aff>Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, U Toronto</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Philip</gnm><snm>Oreopoulos</snm><aff>U British Columbia</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>136</ppf>
<ppl>63</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper reports on an experimental evaluation of strategies
designed to improve academic performance among college freshmen.
One treatment group was offered academic support services. Another
was offered financial incentives for good grades. A third group combined
both interventions. Service use was highest for women and for
subjects in the combined group. The combined treatment also raised
the grades and improved the academic standing of women. These differentials
persisted through the end of second year, though incentives
were given in the first year only. This suggests study skills among some
treated women increased. In contrast, the program had no effect on
men. (JEL I21, I28)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.136</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.136</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Sticking with Your Vote: Cognitive Dissonance and Political Attitudes</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Sendhil</gnm><snm>Mullainathan</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Ebonya</gnm><snm>Washington</snm><aff>Yale U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>86</ppf>
<ppl>111</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Cognitive dissonance theory predicts that the act of voting for a
candidate
leads to a more favorable opinion of the candidate in the
future. We find support for the empirical relevance of cognitive dissonance
to political attitudes. We examine the presidential opinion
ratings of voting-age eligibles and ineligibles two years after the president's
election. We find that eligibles show two to three times greater
polarization of opinions than comparable ineligibles. We find smaller
effects when we compare polarization in opinions of senators elected
during high turnout presidential campaign years with senators elected
during nonpresidential campaign years. (JEL D72)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.86</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.86</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0018_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Separated at Girth: US Twin Estimates of the Effects of Birth Weight</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Heather</gnm><snm>Royer</snm><aff>Case Western Reserve U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>49</ppf>
<ppl>85</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>The fetal origins hypothesis asserts that nutrient deprivation in utero
can raise chronic disease risk. Within economics, this hypothesis has
gained acceptance as a leading explanation for the correlations between
birth weight, a proxy for fetal nutrient intake, and adult outcomes.
Exploiting birth-weight differences between twins using (a) a newlycreated
dataset of twins from 1960-1982 California birth records and
(b) the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Birth Cohort, I find birth
weight is related to educational attainment, later pregnancy complications,
and the birth weight of the next generation. These effects are generally
small. However, the protective effects of birth weight vary across
the birth-weight distribution. (JEL: I12, I21, J13)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.49</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.49</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0002_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Labor Supply Responses to Large Social Transfers: Longitudinal Evidence from South Africa</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Cally</gnm><snm>Ardington</snm><aff>U Cape Town</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Anne</gnm><snm>Case</snm><aff>Princeton U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Victoria</gnm><snm>Hosegood</snm><aff>London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>22</ppf>
<ppl>48</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>We quantify the labor supply responses of prime-aged adults to the
presence of pensioners in their households, using longitudinal data
collected in South Africa. We compare households and individuals
before and after pension receipt and pension loss, which allows us
to control for a host of unobservable household and individual characteristics
that may determine labor market behavior. We find large
cash transfers to the elderly lead to increased employment among
prime-aged adults, which occurs primarily through labor migration.
The pension's impact is attributable to the increase in household
resources it represents, which can be used to stake migrants until
they become self-sufficient, and to the presence of pensioners who
can care for small children, which allows prime-aged adults to look
for work elsewhere. (JEL H23, H55, I38, J22, O15)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.22</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.22</doi>
<dataset>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/data/2007-0043_data.zip</dataset>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Editor's Note</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Esther</gnm><snm>Duflo</snm><aff>MIT</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>iii</ppf>
<ppl>vi</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.iii</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.iii</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Educational Debt Burden and Career Choice: Evidence from a Financial Aid Experiment at NYU Law School</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Erica</gnm><snm>Field</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>21</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper examines the influence of psychological responses to debt
on career choices from an experiment in which alternative financial
aid packages were assigned by lottery to a set of law school admits.
The packages had equivalent monetary value, but one required the
student to take on a loan that would be paid for by the school if he
worked in public interest law, while the other covered tuition as long
as the student worked in public interest law. If he did not, the student
would be required to reimburse the school. Tuition assistance recipients
have a 36 to 45 percent higher public interest placement rate
and, when lottery results were announced before enrollment, were
twice as likely to enroll. (JEL I21, I22, J44, D14)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.1</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>1945-7782</issn>
<issn_online>1945-7790</issn_online>
<jrnti>American Economic Journal: Applied Economics</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/aej-applied/</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>1</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>January 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=APP&volume=1&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>i</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/app.1.1.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/app.1.1.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


