Gender Differences in Medical Evaluations: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Doctors
American Economic Review
vol. 114,
no. 2, February 2024
(pp. 462-99)
Abstract
Little is known about what drives gender disparities in health care and related social insurance benefits. Using data and variation from the Texas workers' compensation program, we study the impact of gender match between doctors and patients on medical evaluations and associated disability benefits. Compared to differences among their male patient counterparts, female patients randomly assigned a female doctor rather than a male doctor are 5.2 percent more likely to be evaluated as disabled and receive 8.6 percent more subsequent cash benefits on average. There is no analogous gender-match effect for male patients. Our estimates indicate that increasing the share of female patients evaluated by female doctors may substantially shrink gender gaps in medical evaluations and associated outcomes.Citation
Cabral, Marika, and Marcus Dillender. 2024. "Gender Differences in Medical Evaluations: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Doctors." American Economic Review, 114 (2): 462-99. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20220349Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- H75 State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
- I11 Analysis of Health Care Markets
- I12 Health Behavior
- J14 Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-labor Market Discrimination
- J16 Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
- J28 Safety; Job Satisfaction; Related Public Policy